NIGERIA IN CONTEMPORARY PROPHECIES

Elijah Ayodele...also prophesied..

“Early in September 2011, while fasting and praying for the national prayer retreat of The Preacher scheduled for later that month, the word of the Lord came to me, 'Pray against the Spirit of Sudan. South Sudan had become independent from the oppressive Islamic north only a few weeks earlier, on July 9. I understood the word to mean that the Satanic principality that had sponsored Sudan’s very oppressive anti-Christ Islamic regime, and sustained twenty cruel years of a most ravaging civil war between the Christian south and the Islamized north, having lost that territory, was seeking another abode, in Nigeria... (The Preacher)"

As I wrote in “Mr President, What If This Prophet Is Not Lying?” (August 22, 2010),  

“I am normally sceptical of seers, particularly when they make a habit of producing booklets and writing letters to persons they have prophesised negatively about asking for audience. That sums up my attitude to Primate Elijah Babatunde Ayodele of INRI Evangelical Spiritual Church, Lagos, over the years. But when that seer consistently gets it right on several very public issues from year to year, even the most sceptical of us have to stand up and listen.”

Continuing, I did a random recall of some of his earlier prophecies citing “his prediction of a Bellview Airline crash of October 2005 and of Sosoliso Airline crash of December 2005, both of which he foresaw and foretold. He told Nigerians in December 2007 that Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, then Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) would be removed in the New Year. He was… he alerted this football loving nation that the senior National team, the Super Eagles, will perform woefully at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. They proved him right.”

It was this antecedent that led me to draw attention to “what he had to say about the political situation in Nigeria and in particular the place of President Goodluck Jonathan in it. This was what he said as I synthesised then from two Lagos-based newspapers.

“I have told you and I repeat it that this democracy will break this country. Apart from democracy breaking this country, the issue of zoning will bring no good to the country. The solution is that Jonathan must not contest the election if you want peace. He should honour the gentleman agreement in the PDP (Peoples Democratic Party) so that the country can move forward. If Jonathan contests, he will win by force but it will cause a lot of problems for the country, and this country may break up as a result of it. …People may see this as a bad prediction, but for those that have ears let them listen to the warning of God. People may criticize it but it is a warning from God. For those that God loves, He reveals himself. People are pushing Jonathan to run for presidency in 2011 but he should not listen to them. …. I know President Jonathan may not like what I’m saying, but he should not listen to sycophants… If Jonathan wants this country to be one indivisible entity, he should not contest next year’s presidential election. I am not against Jonathan, but that is what God says. We are saying it the way God revealed it to us. This is not a matter of calculation; it is what God said.”

Of course that piece did include my own admonition to the man who is now our president not to run, not because, I heard God say so, but because, in my perspective, it wasn’t the Christian thing to do. I shall not bore you with further details of that. But it should suffice that I lost no opportunity to drum in this viewpoint. No, I didn’t see the repercussions of running in these bloody terms; nor did I wish for this to be the turn of events, merely to be proved right. Indeed, I’ll joyfully be wrong in matters of this nature.

Unfortunately, the tally in bodies has continued to mount across Northern Nigeria. Boko Haram the current tormentor of our land is becoming bolder, more brazen and more blood-thirsty. Our nation is slowly but steadily headed for the abyss.

I muse to myself, again and again, what if Dr Goodluck Jonathan had allowed himself to be swayed away from the messianic syndrome? What if he had looked beyond the lure of power and the pomp and glory of high office! Yes, some would have described him as a coward; he would have gone down in history as the one who walked away from power. Even his brethren in the Niger Delta might have still be hounding him as the man who caused his race the opportunity to rule Nigeria. But see where that opportunistic move has gotten us.

As I wonder about it all, into the prophetic fray comes the Preacher, a Port Harcourt, Nigeria based prayer ministry .The Preacher. The ministry, which began in 1981 circulating mimeographs to a few hundred people today reaches out to thousands and “attracting several compelling testimonies from the leadership and laity of the Body of Christ…”, making the ministry “a voice in the wilderness of the present generation”.

Permit me to quote from a December 2011 release of the Preacher:

“Early in September 2011, while fasting and praying for the national prayer retreat of The Preacher scheduled for later that month, the word of the Lord came to me, “Pray against the Spirit of Sudan.” South Sudan had become independent from the oppressive Islamic north only a few weeks earlier, on July 9. I understood the word to mean that the Satanic principality that had sponsored Sudan’s very oppressive anti-Christ Islamic regime, and sustained twenty cruel years of a most ravaging civil war between the Christian south and the Islamized north, having lost that territory, was seeking another abode, in Nigeria. I took it as a personal prayer point even though, later, I had to send out sms’s to a few friends…  

“In September 9-11, 2011, there was the retreat of The Preacher in the Middle Belt city of Jos, Nigeria. In the process of the prayer vigil on the second night of that retreat, a sister with remarkable prophetic gifts raised a prayer concern about Nigeria. She used the same words to describe her burden as she called us all to pray against “the spirit of Sudan.” I was frightened. It was no mere coincidence. I realized at once that God had confirmed His word in the mouth of a second witness. Anyone who has gone through the horrors of one civil war will never wish to experience another. Ask them in Liberia, Sierra Leon, Libya, and ask the elders in eastern Nigeria who suffered the Biafran war…”

The Preacher went on to say many other things that space does not permit here. But let’s be clear about something, we certainly must move against the spirit of Sudan. Prayer is a very important part of the mix. A National Conference is another. The time is now.

  

TO THE CONFERENCE TABLE, O NIGERIA (2)

David Mark, Senate President

“Now, truth be told, it takes class suicide for a group benefiting from a given state of affair to work at changing it. That takes selflessness, courage and a zealous commitment to the greater good of the greater number within the polity. In this respect, I regret to state that in Nigeria, as the novelist would have put it, the beautiful ones are not yet born. In other words, it is unlikely that the 1999 Constitution will be reviewed. If it is, it will not be far-reaching enough to make any difference, because it is not in the interest of those currently at the helm of affairs to do so. Of course, there might be among them patriots willing to lose some privileges, if necessary, but they are in the minority. All of that is if we discount the fact that what Nigeria needs is a new Constitution and a sitting assembly is not equipped for such an assignment…

I did not plan to return to this subject, at least, not on the immediate. But reading the exchanges on one of the FB groups I have the privilege of participating in has kept my interest in the subject alive. One of the highlights of that discussion is the insistence by some very honest, very well-meaning, and absolutely patriotic people that the National Assembly is representative enough of Nigeria’s diversity, legitimate enough and therefore competent to handle the national question.

Opening the discussion on the subject in Nigerian Legislature Surveillance Group a couple of days ago, Eghes Eyieyien, a man whose passion for Nigeria is truly inspiring, wrote:

“The events of the last few weeks have increased the calls for a Sovereign National Conference (SNC). I still believe that the National Assembly, being comprised of duly elected representatives of the Nigerian people, is competent to handle any and all the issues which the SNC is to cover. The NASS successfully amended aspects of the Constitution in 2010 and can still be counted upon to do so especially since the members of the 7th Assembly are widely acknowledged to have actually won the elections that brought them into the legislature. Their legitimacy is incontrovertible...”

He went on to list some of the critical issues which, in his opinion, should be top on the constitutional amendment agenda of the National Assembly; issues which, if they did, would help put Nigeria on the path of unity and progress.

Tayo Akinola thought differently: “I really do not agree with you that the National Assembly should handle the SNC which everybody is gradually seeing as the only way out for us to get out of the crossroad we found ourselves and these are my reasons: 

“1. There is this tendency for the honourables to dance to the tunes of their parties and not the people of their constituency in arriving at a point.

“2. Part of the outcome of the so-called SNC will even affect the National Assembly members (it may not be the current set of NA members but definitely future ones). Allowing them to be the referee in a game that they are also a player will be unfair to the people of our country.

3. The duration of the SNC should be known from the beginning and I think it should be between 6 – 9 months and elected members to the conference should see it as a full time job for that period of time.

“4. The SNC should not be a reason for the NA for any delay in passing the other pending bills that they are working on.

“5. Decisions are usually arrived at in the NA through votes and this might most probably not work during the convening of the SNC. An example is the issue of State Police. If a part of the country wants state police and others do not want it, then does that means the part that prefer it should not have her wish? We should have it at the back of our mind that the SNC is an avenue to be 100% sincere with each other at least for once and also, the representatives of each community will for a very long time either be an hero or a traitor to his people.”

Many contributors chose to address the issues Eghes put on the front burner; issues like bicameral versus unicameral legislative arrangement and size of the legislature, while some raised the number of states etc. But as I read these contributions. I was reminded of the situation in 2009 when I found myself writing a piece titled, Who Will Save Nigeria?”

 I shall repeat here some of the points I made, because the factors that led to those observations then have not changed, even if the actors and the drama have changed a bit.

In that February 8, piece as I contemplated the melodrama about the National Assembly’s inability to even agree on the headship of their constitution review committee, I had this to say:

“Now, truth be told, it takes class suicide for a group benefiting from a given state of affair to work at changing it. That takes selflessness, courage and a zealous commitment to the greater good of the greater number within the polity. In this respect, I regret to state that in Nigeria, as the novelist would have put it, the beautiful ones are not yet born. In other words, it is unlikely that the 1999 Constitution will be reviewed. If it is, it will not be far-reaching enough to make any difference, because it is not in the interest of those currently at the helm of affairs to do so. Of course, there might be among them patriots willing to lose some privileges, if necessary, but they are in the minority. All of that is if we discount the fact that what Nigeria needs is a new Constitution and a sitting assembly is not equipped for such an assignment…

“As I write this, whether at the Presidency or at the National Assembly, all I see are people more interested in sustaining the status quo; with a bit of tinkering here and there. But it is not going to work.”

In that piece, I concluded by making the same point that I made here last week and in my NLSG facebook contribution as follows:

“One wise man said, no matter how far you've gone on a wrong road, turn back! There is a Biblical principle for it - it’s called the axe-head principle and it’s based on an incident recorded in the second book of Kings Chapter 6. The so-called children of the prophets had lost the head of a borrowed axe. It fell into River Jordan in the process of cutting trees for use in the building of a new camp. They sought the help of Prophet Elisha. The story climaxed in verse six like this: ‘Where did it fall?" Elisha asked. The man showed him the place, and Elisha cut off a stick, threw it in the water, and made the axe head float.’ It is generally agreed among dispassionate observers that we lost our way when we buried true federalism, and concentrated virtually all powers at the centre. We need to return to that spot to find our way forward. Will the beneficiaries of the aberration preside over the dismantling of their privileges? That is the question.”

We must make them do it. Time is running out.

TO THE CONFERENCE TABLE, O NIGERIA!

Alhaji Asari Dokubo

"On the other hand, my dear brothers and sisters in the Niger Delta couldn’t see themselves protesting a policy put in place by their beloved son, in whom they are well pleased; that being, President Goodluck Jonathan! You needed to see Asari Dokubo’s theatrics as he threatened to have his men occupy the oil platforms to prevent oil workers from carrying out their threat to shut themdown by midnight Saturday. According to him, if they take it over, they won’t ever vacate it again!"

And so, the “mother of all strikes” threatened by Labour and its civil society allies did hold!  For all of five days, Nigeria was shut down. For all of five days, Nigerians from all strata of society gathered in thousands, tens of thousands, and scores of thousands as the case may be in virtually every major town across the nation.

It is unprecedented. Not even the agitation for the actualisation of the June 12, 1993 electoral mandate of Bashorun M.K.O Abiola was this massive and this consistent. Although, fatalities have unfortunately been reported in a number of centres, the street protests and rallies have been largely peaceful – amazingly! The organisers, particularly in Lagos and Abuja deserve commendation for their efforts to keep it so.

The security agencies have also comported themselves well, largely, save for pockets of overzealousness in a few centres. The Federal government deserve commendation for this. Attributable to the public temperament of President Goodluck Jonathan as this is, the fact may also be stated that the world has become more intolerant of suppression of peoples rights of protest; making the fear of The International Criminal Court (ICC) the beginning of wisdom.

No matter how this ends, and I can’t see it ending any other way but the People’s way, the sights and sounds from the Gani Fawehinmi (Freedom) Square, at Ojota, Lagos will remain in the subconscious of many Nigerians, particularly those of current leaders of our nation for a long time. It will also ring across the annals as a warning to potential dictators.

But let’s face it, fall-outs from this anti-subsidy campaign has made the need to rethink this federation more urgent. This is what I mean.

In my understanding of the issues, I thought we were talking about the existence or otherwise of a subsidy on the pump price of petrol in Nigeria, and, if there is, whether it is desirable to retain or remove it.

I thought that we were contending at the level of ideas about government’s insistence that there is indeed a subsidy and that it must be removed for Nigeria’s economy to afford bankruptcy in the near to medium term and opposition’s position against government’s.

I thought that there was an emerging consensus that if indeed there is a subsidy to be removed then there must be safety nets prior to its removal as against government’s inclination to withdraw the subsidy and then use its proceeds to put palliatives in place.

I also thought that the strike was called because government in defiance of labour and civil society’s opposition and while consultations were still supposedly on-going, stealthily implemented its position wholesale.

This was why I wrote here last week as follows: “There must be better ways of implementing a public policy that its designers swear to high heavens is meant to ultimately benefit the masses. Governance by stealth, by deceit cannot be one of the ways. And to think that spokespersons of this administration claim an awareness of the fact that Nigerians don’t trust their government. This one not excluded! I won’t waste your time trying to argue for or against the policy itself; not least because I think it’s simply one of those numbers- rather than people-based, one-size-fits-all imposition of the Breton Woods institutions. But for God’s sake why sneak it in while giving every body the impression you are still consulting?!”

But, I seemed to have missed something, if reactions from parts of the South East and the Niger Delta, as reported in the media, are anything to go by.

According to those reports some of my brethren in the East wouldn’t partake of the campaign because, when their kith and kin were being killed by Boko Haram in parts of the North, nobody called people out on strike. On the other hand, my dear brothers and sisters in the Niger Delta couldn’t see themselves protesting a policy put in place by their beloved son, in whom they are well pleased; that being, President Goodluck Jonathan! You needed to see Asari Dokubo’s theatrics as he threatened to have his men occupy the oil platforms to prevent oil workers from carrying out their threat to shut themdown by midnight Saturday. According to him, if they take it over, they won’t ever vacate it again!

Now, coming against the background of earlier Boko Haram ultimatum for Christians to leave the North and Moslems in the South to return home; an ultimatum they followed at expiration with the murder of Christians at a service, I think, we might be more divided than its obviously too politically incorrect for our leaders to admit.

I listened to Methodist Prelate Sunday Ola Makinde on television recently quoting from I Kings chapter 12 the unfortunate division of Israel into two right after the death of Solomon and I shudder to contemplate a similar fate for this nation.

Of course, I am fully persuade that God didn’t keep us together this long, thus far to now abandon us. I am fully persuaded that the God’s perfect will for our nation is reflected in word of God that came to me on January 1 from Isaiah 41:11-13: “Don't worry--I am with you. Don't be afraid--I am your God. I will make you strong. I will help you. I will support you with my right hand that brings victory.  Look, some people are angry with you, but they will be ashamed and disgraced. Your enemies will be lost and disappear.  You will look for the people who were against you, but you will not be able to find them. Those who fought against you will disappear completely.  I am the LORD your God, who holds your right hand. And I tell you, 'Don't be afraid! I will help you.’” But then, man has been known to force God’s hands into “permissive will” mode. To avoid that; to stop tempting God, we need to talk now, before it is too late.

2012…SO FAR, NO SURPRISES!

President G. E. A Jonathan

I wish desperately to be proven wrong, but how right can one be! How can we now trust him to do all that he has promised; when he can cave in to opportunism at the drop of a hat? Trust is an invaluable substance between leaders and the led. Even God so courted our trust that He swore by Himself!

By the time you read this, the year 2012 would have been eight days old…eight action-packed days. Eight days of suffering for many and of anger for most. And you already know why. It is called “total deregulation of the downstream sector of the oil and gas industry”, otherwise known as withdrawal of subsidy on premium motor spirit (petrol), otherwise known as petrol price hike. It was a new year present, packaged by President Goodluck Jonathan and his transformation crew, and delivered with love and best wishes to the people of Nigeria.

Coming exactly one week after the Christmas package delivered to Nigerians by the Boko Haram sect through its attack at St Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla near Abuja, it made the 2011/2012 yuletide season one to remember.

Apart from the various sights of angry protesters in what some have characterised as an Occupy Nigeria campaign, there have been fantastic “photoshop” reactions online too. You might have seen the gentleman peeing in his petrol tank. Or the lady on her knees before her car’s open tank, a big water container besides her, and her Bible aloft, apparently praying for the water to transform to wine (sorry petrol), so she can fill her tank. You might have also received mock sales notices of gas guzzling vehicles put up for sale at prices far below those of bicycles, horses and donkeys!

While these are intended for comic relief, the realities are as grim. Many people who travelled to their home towns and villages, as is usual during the Christmas/new year season, were stranded because they could not afford the new fares of between 100 and 200% increase back to base. Reports of some punning their mobile phones and other items are widespread. Many are, as I write this, still unable to fund their return journey.

There is this scenario that keeps playing in my head. Citizen Joe, as he was wont to do, had perfected his financial plan. He had saved for his children’s school fees due early in January, put aside enough money to transport himself to and from work until his next pay day, and set aside something for the garri-soaking season post end-of-year festivities. Then he got the transformation package from his president. Not one to complain, and desirous of living within his means, he decided he would walk part of the way to and from work. As he sweats his way home in the hot and humid weather, he feels dehydrated. Needing water to get some strength, he approached the “poor” water vendor, his precious N5 in hand, only to be told, sorry “na ten naira”. Citizen Joe fainted!

There must be better ways of implementing a public policy that its designers swear to high heavens is meant to ultimately benefit the masses. Governance by stealth, by deceit cannot be one of the ways. And to think that spokespersons of this administration claim an awareness of the fact that Nigerians don’t trust their government. This one not excluded!

I won’t waste your time trying to argue for or against the policy itself; not least because I think it’s simply one of those numbers- rather than people-based, one-size-fits-all imposition of the Breton Woods institutions. But for God’s sake why sneak it in while giving every body the impression you are still consulting?!

As recently as December 21, 2011, Daily Times Nigeria was still reporting that “the Federal Government…is yet to fix a date for the commencement of the removal of petroleum subsidy. Briefing journalists after the last Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting for the year, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja earlier today, Labaran Maku, the Minister of Information said the government was still engaging different groups in dialogue for a proper understanding of the subsidy issue.” Many other news outfits reported the same.

But, as I said in the headline today, I am not surprised. I am on record as saying that one should never set much store on Dr Goodluck Jonathan’s words. In the run-down to the elections last year, I wrote as follows:

“Dr Goodluck Jonathan is an amiable man who affects a kind of humility uncommon in the history of our presidency. But I submit with all sense of responsibility, that the very fact that he is in this race on the ticket of PDP, puts his integrity to test. I do not support zoning, but he did. He is a signatory to the initial document that affirmed the scheme within his party and a beneficiary of the arrangement. To try, as he did, to sophistically repudiate the arrangement is sheer opportunism. Affecting to be different, he has nonetheless manifested the same double standards, which successive Nigerian leaders have institutionalized. He knows that the use of government facilities for partisan political purposes is, at least, opportunistic and immoral, if not fraudulent. Under his watch, impunity has returned, with the legislative crisis in Ogun state, denial of access to campaign venues, by governments run by PDP as in the case of Buhari at Mapo Hall, Ibadan are poster examples. The point being made here is that the president’s rhetoric has not been matched by his actions and omissions…”

I wish desperately to be proven wrong, but how right can one be! How can we now trust him to do all that he has promised; when he can cave in to opportunism at the drop of a hat? Trust is an invaluable substance between leaders and the led. Even God so courted our trust that He swore by Himself!

Anyway, not only am I not surprised, I am also not worried. And I urge all my compatriots not to be worried, not by this betrayal nor by Boko Haram. In the early hours of January 1, the Holy Spirit led me to these verses of scripture:

Don't worry--I am with you. Don't be afraid--I am your God. I will make you strong. I will help you. I will support you with my right hand that brings victory. Look, some people are angry with you, but they will be ashamed and disgraced. Your enemies will be lost and disappear. You will look for the people who were against you, but you will not be able to find them. Those who fought against you will disappear completely. I am the LORD your God, who holds your right hand. And I tell you, 'Don't be afraid! I will help you.’ (Isaiah 41:10-13).

It’s a message, as much to us as individuals, as it is to our nation. Happy new year, once again.

THE KINGDOM WAY TO FIGHT BOKO HARAM, ETC

Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor
President, CAN

"Earlier at the site of the carnage, he told reporters that, while he does not support reprisal attacks, Christians need to rise up and defend themselves. That was not the first time he would be making such a call. Nor has he been alone. Other Christian leaders are on record as saying the same thing. Problem is they never say how!"

In the aftermath of the Christmas day bombing of St Theresa’s Catholic Church, Madalla, near Abuja, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, President, Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), was livid with anger. His Tuesday statement said that much:

"I am extremely angry. This is a barbaric and most uncivilised action of human beings in a civilised world. Even animals have respect for each other. It is inhuman, it's barbaric! It's satanic…Christmas is a day when over 80 million Nigerians join billions of fellow Christians across the globe to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, wouldn't you just respect that?...”

Earlier at the site of the carnage, he told reporters that, while he does not support reprisal attacks, Christians need to rise up and defend themselves. That was not the first time he would be making such a call. Nor has he been alone. Other Christian leaders are on record as saying the same thing. Problem is they never say how!

This was why I wrote a four-part serial, “Understanding Kingdom Warfare,” last February. And that is why I am reproducing much of the concluding part of that serial this wonderful New Year’s Day in the hope that somebody out there will catch the vision.

“…The following points can bear repeating: One; that the call upon our brothers and sisters in northern Nigeria, who have been the target of brutal, fatal attacks to rise in self-defence, has come not a moment too soon. This is because the aberration of children of a warrior God known and addressed liberally in scripture as Jehovah Sabaoth (the Lord of the Armies of Heaven), being made mince meat, as it were, by agents of a defeated cowardly foe has gone on for too long.

“Two, support for that point of view is not support for physically arming Christians with guns and machetes and bombs and forming militias. It is quite simply a call upon children of God to rise up and utilize those weapons that are already available to them as identified in the Bible; weapons, which are in no way physical or carnal; yet they are no less potent. This much is clear from these words of Apostle Paul: “the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds” (2 Corinthians 10:4).

“Three, the resort to spiritual, rather than physical weapons, is necessitated by the biblical insight that the men and women who stalk, attack, maim and kill are not the real enemies. They are mere tools in the hands of an evil general known as satan, who is a spirit and can therefore only be dealt with in the spirit realm. Again Apostle Paul offered us that insight when he wrote: ‘For we are not wrestling with flesh and blood [contending only with physical opponents], but against the despotisms, against the powers, against [the master spirits who are] the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spirit forces of wickedness in the heavenly (supernatural) sphere (Ephesians 6:12)…’  

“Four, the same Paul identified what he called the whole armour of God clearly in verses 14-17 of Ephesians 6 from which we have already quoted as follows: ‘Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God’ (emphasis added).

“Five…all but the last component of the ‘whole armour of God’ are defensive weapons. Only the sword of the spirit is a weapon of offense. Yet, a very critical part of defensive warfare is attack, preemptive attack or to put in street language ‘attack is the best form of defence’.

“The point was also made that the Church, generally speaking, cannot be found guilty of failing to teach on truth, righteousness, the gospel of peace, faith and salvation. This, as I noted, is understandable because, they are “basic and foundational to our faith”…Unfortunately the word as the sword of the Spirit is not as comprehensively taught as it ought to be, and that is what has given the enemy the victory he continues to enjoy, not just in northern Nigeria, but in virtually every part of the world.”  Happy new year, Nigeria.

Yet, the Bible didn’t mince words about the place of the word in Kingdom warfare. The writer of the book of Hebrews said of this power-packed weapon: “The word is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword… (4:12). The Good News translation of the latter part of Ephesians 6:17 urges us to “accept…the word of God as the sword which the Spirit gives you” while the Amplified version in that same verse described the word as “the sword that the Spirit wields…” 

At least two verses in the book of Revelations throw further light on this subject. First, the Lord Jesus was not armed any differently. It was said of him that …”out of his mouth went a sharp two-edged sword” (1:16), and then described tellingly as “he which hath the sharp sword with two edges” (2:12).”

Two things become apparent here. The Lord won all his victories not by using bazookas and ICBMs. He won by using the word. Two, he won by doing the one thing that you do with words: spoke them out of his mouth, using his tongue, allowed them beyond his lips. In other words our mouths serve as the rocket launchers. That explains why the Bible has such verses as:  “Death and life are in the power of the tongue…” (Proverbs 18:21); “…the lips of the wise shall preserve them (Proverbs 14:3)…”

The critical point to note in all of these, however, is that the mouth is not a free agent. It does not speak of its own volition; it speaks what the mind says to speak. The mind, on the other hand, is, at every given point, fed by one of two sources: the Spirit of God though the heart, or the spirit of satan through the senses.  The Bible puts it this way: “A good man out of the good treasure of his heart (mind) bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart (mind) bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh (Luke 6:45; parenthesis added).

It takes knowledge to grasp these truths and run with them. That is why teaching is very critical and urgent, if we are to rise from the current helpless victim mentality that pervades the church.